Monthly Archives: December 2013

The Snickers Effect: Addressing a Conservative’s Doubts About the Human Contribution to Climate Change

This entry was posted in Conservatives, Pure Cap-and-Dividend, Science on by .

After seeing my most recent update on LinkedIn, my conservative friend Michael Perullo responded to express some doubts about Pure Cap-and-Dividend, my proposal to cap greenhouse gas emissions.  Mike wrote: “We must dramatically reduce OUR greenhouse gas emissions to combat climate change? No matter the incentives, how could man ever MATERIALLY impact atmospheric CO2? There […]

Read More ...

Decoding the “Price on Carbon” Jargon – Part II

This entry was posted in Back to Basics, carbon tax, Pure Cap-and-Dividend on by .

In today’s New York Times, Coral Davenport reports, “More than two dozen of the nation’s biggest corporations, including the five major oil companies, are planning their future growth on the expectation that the government will force them to pay a price for carbon pollution as a way to control global warming.” That’s great news.  And […]

Read More ...

Decoding the “Price on Carbon” Jargon

This entry was posted in Back to Basics, carbon tax, Pure Cap-and-Dividend on by .

Academics serious about addressing the climate crisis agree: we need to put a price on carbon.  But it’s tough to sell an idea without a shared vocabulary and many people are unclear about what this phrase – “put a price on carbon” – even means.  Still more are puzzled by terms like “cap-and-trade,” “fee-and-dividend,” and […]

Read More ...